黄土高原农户可持续生计评估及未来生计策略——基于陕西延安市和宁夏固原市1076 户农户调查

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.02.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农户可持续生计问题是黄土高原自实施生态退耕政策以来备受关注的关键科学问题之一。通过构建可持续生计效益评价模型, 对农户可持续生计效益进行了分级评价, 并分析了不同类型农户的可持续生计效益差异。结果表明:① 具有较高可持续生计效益指数的农户生计收入构成趋向于多元化, 不同生计策略收入所占比重也趋向平均化, 而生计效益指数较低的农户主要依赖于外出打工、卖粮菜等个别生计策略;② 各类型农户的人均生计效益指数和人均年收入排序呈现出:发展果园型>做小生意型>外出打工型>大棚种植型>舍饲养殖型。基于可持续生计效益评价并结合主体功能区战略, 提出4 种黄土高原未来生计策略:① 推进人口城镇化, 有序引导生态脆弱地区人口外迁;② 促进农地流转, 扩大农业生产规模;③ 拓展生计策略, 增强收入来源多样性;④ 加强技术培训, 提高农户非农生计可持续性。

关键词: 黄土高原, 可持续生计, 生计效益指数, 未来生计策略

Abstract: Farmers’sustainable livelihoods have been one of the key issues that deserve the attention from the public since the ecological restoration policy was implemented on the Loess Plateau. Under the background of propelling the formation of major functional zones, the assessment of farmers’sustainable livelihoods is an important premise for ecological restoration and protection as well as the regional sustainable development. By establishing a benefit-assessment model, this paper evaluates and grades the benefits of farmers’sustainable livelihoods, and assesses the differences between the benefits for different types of farmers. The results are shown as follows: The livelihoods income of the farmers with high livelihoods benefit index are generated by diversified livelihood strategies, and the incomes by different strategies tend to share nearly averaged proportions, however, those with low livelihoods benefit index mainly rely on a particular strategy such as going out to work or selling grain and vegetables. Ranking of livelihood benefit index per capita and annual income per capita of farmers of different types is shown as such: developing orchard > doing small business > going out to work > greenhouse planting> raising livestock. Based on the assessment of sustainable livelihoods benefits and the strategy of major functional zones, we put forward future livelihoods strategies for the Loess Plateau in four directions: (1) Impelling population urbanization, guiding the population gradual migration out of ecologically fragile areas; (2) Propelling rural land circulation, enlarging the scale of agricultural production; (3) Promoting livelihood strategies, diversifying the sources of farmers’incomes; (4) Enhancing the technical training, improving the sustainability of farmers’non-agricultural livelihoods.

Key words: future livelihood strategy, livelihood benefit index, Loess Plateau, sustainable livelihoods

汤青, 徐勇, 李扬. 黄土高原农户可持续生计评估及未来生计策略——基于陕西延安市和宁夏固原市1076 户农户调查[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2): 161-169.

TANG Qing, XU Yong, LI Yang. Assessment of farmers’sustainable livelihoods and future strategies on the Loess Plateau: Based on a survey of 1076 farmers in Yan’an City in Shaanxi Province and Guyuan City in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(2): 161-169.

参考文献

[1] Ashley C, Carney D. 1999. Sustainable livelihoods: Lessonsfrom early experience. London: Department for International Development.

[2] Cai Q G, Lu Z X, Wang G P, et al. 1996. Process-based soilerosion and sediment yield model in a small basin in the Hilly Loess Region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 51(2):108-117. [蔡强国, 陆兆熊, 王贵平, 等. 1996. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域侵蚀产沙过程模型. 地理学报, 51(2): 108-117.]

[3] Cannon T, Twigg J, Rowell J. 2004. Social vulnerability, sustainablelivelihoods and disasters. London: Departmentfor International Development.

[4] Carney D. 1998. Implementing a sustainable livelihood approach. London: Department for International Development.

[5] Chambers R, Conway G. 1992. Sustainable rurual livelihoods:practical concepts for the 21^st century. IDS Discussion Paper296. Brighton, England: Institute of Development Studies.

[6] Chen L D, Fu B J, Messing I. 2001. Sustainable land-use planningin a typical catchment in the Loess Plateau: A casestudy. Geographical Research, 20(6): 713-722. [陈利顶,傅伯杰, Messing I. 2001. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域土地持续利用案例研究. 地理研究, 20(6): 713-722.]

[7] DFID. 2000. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Department for International Development.

[8] Ellis F. 2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developmentcountries. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Frankenberger T R, Drinkwater M, Maxwell D. 2000. Operationalizinghousehold livelihood security: A holistic approachfor addressing poverty and vulnerability [EB/OL].2000-07-03[2012-05-29]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/X9371E/x9371e12.htm.

[10] Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M. 1999. The effect of land usechange on the regional environment in the Yangjuangou Catchment in the Loess Plateau of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(3): 241-246. [ 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明.1999. 黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响: 以延安羊圈沟为例. 地理学报, 54(3): 241-246.]

[11] Hu S X, Jin C X. 1999. Theoretical analysis and experimentalstudy on the critical slope of erosion. Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(4): 347-356. [胡世雄, 靳长兴. 1999. 坡面土壤侵蚀临界坡度问题的理论与实验研究. 地理学报, 54(4): 347-356.]

[12] Jiang D S, Gao K X. 2000. Resources potentiality of dam landand pattern of constructing dam system in Loess Hill regionof second section. Bulletin of soil and water conservation,20(5): 35-38. [蒋定生, 高可兴. 2000. 黄土丘陵第Ⅱ副区坝地资源潜力与坝系建造模式. 水土保持通报,20(5): 35-38.]

[13] Li S Z, Liang Y C, Marcus W F, et al. 2010. The impact of Grain for Green Program on rural livelihoods in China: Sustainable livelihoods analysis in a perspective of householdcomposition. Journal of Public Management, 7(2):1-11. [李树茁, 梁义成, Marcus W F, 等. 2010. 退耕还林政策对农户生计的影响研究: 基于家庭结构视角的可持续生计分析. 公共管理学报, 7(2): 1-11.]

[14] Lu C H, van Ittersum M K. 2004. A trade-off analysis of policyobjectives for Ansai, the Loess Plateau of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 102(3): 235-246.

[15] Roberts M G, Yang G A. 2003. The international progress ofsustainable development research: A comparison of vulnerabilityanalysis and the sustainable livelihoods approach. Progress in Geography, 22(1): 11-21. [Roberts M G, 杨国安. 2003. 可持续发展研究方法国际进展: 脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较. 地理科学进展, 22(1): 11-21.]

[16] Sen A. 1981. Famines and poverty. London: Oxford University Press.

[17] Su F, Pu X D, Xu Z M, et al. 2009. Analysis about the relationshipbetween livelihood capital and livelihood strategies: Take Ganzhou in Zhangye City as an example. China Population Resources and Environment, 19(6): 119-125.[苏芳, 蒲欣冬, 徐中民, 等. 2009. 生计资本与生计策略关系研究: 以张掖市甘州区为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 19(6): 119-125.]

[18] Su F, Xu Z M, Shang H Y. 2009. An overview of sustainablelivelihoods approach. Advances in Earth Science, 24(1):61-69. [苏芳, 徐中民, 尚海洋. 2009. 可持续生计分析研究综述. 地球科学进展, 24(1): 61-69.]

[19] Tian J L, Liang Y M, Liu P L. 2003. Research on eco-agricultureconstruction of meso-scale area in the Loess Hilly-gully Region. Zhengzhou, China: Water Conservancy Press of Yellow River. [ 田均良, 梁一民, 刘普灵.2003. 黄土高原丘陵区中尺度生态农业建设探索. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社.]

[20] Tian J L, Liu P L, Zhang Y. 2000. The management of soil andwater loss to rebuild a graceful Yan'an with green mountainsand clean water rivers: Understanding and thinkingconcerning premier Zhu's instructions on eco-environmentconstruction. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,7(2): 4-9. [田均良, 刘普灵, 张翼. 2000. 治理水土流失再造山川秀美延安: 对中尺度生态环境建设中落实朱总理指示的认识和思考. 水土保持研究, 7(2): 4-9.]

[21] Wang C, Wang L P, Li X Q, et al. 2011. The source of the forward-security of farmers' livelihood and settlement integration: Based on the survey of 477 farmers in Bailin Village,west suburbs of Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica,66(8): 1141-1152. [王成, 王利平, 李晓庆, 等. 2011.农户后顾生计来源及其居民点整合研究: 基于重庆市西部郊区白林村477 户农户调查. 地理学报, 66(8):1141-1152.]

[22] Wang C C, Yang Y S. 2011. Impact of rural households' nonfarmemployment on cropland transfer: Case of Changting County in Fujian Province, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(11): 1362-1367. [ 王成超, 杨玉盛. 2011. 农户生计非农化对耕地流转的影响: 以福建省长汀县为例. 地理科学, 31(11): 1362-1367.]

[23] Wang C C, Yang Y S. 2012. An overview of farmers' livelihoodstrategy change and its effect on land use/coverchange in developing countries. Progress in Geography,31(6): 792-798. [王成超, 杨玉盛. 2012. 基于农户生计策略的土地利用/覆被变化效应综述. 地理科学进展, 31(6): 792-798.]

[24] Wang C C, Yang Y S, Zhang Y Q. 2011. Economic development,rural livelihoods, and ecological restoration: Evidencefrom China. AMBIO, 40(1): 78-87.

[25] Wang F, Li R, Wen Z M. 2002. Survey of factors affectingeco-environmental benefits of cropland conversion: Acase-based study on cropland conversion experimentalstation in Ansai County. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,22(3): 1-4. [王飞, 李锐, 温仲明. 2002. 退耕工程生态环境效益发挥的影响因素调查研究: 以安塞县退耕还林(草)试点为例. 水土保持通报, 22(3): 1-4.]

[26] Xu J X. 2000. Some problems and research requirements concerningeco-environmental construction on the Loess Plateau. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 7(2): 10-13. [许炯心. 2000. 黄土高原生态环境建设的若干问题与研究需求. 水土保持研究, 7(2): 10-13.]

[27] Xu Y, Tang Q. 2009. Land use optimization at small watershedscale on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences,19(5): 577-586.

[28] Xu Y, Tian J L, Shen H Q. 2002. Eco-environmental rehabilitationand spatial differentiation based on enlarging terraceand defarming in the Loess Hilly-gully Region. Journalof Natural Resources, 17(4): 430-437. [徐勇, 田均良, 沈洪泉. 2002. 黄土丘陵区“梯田退耕”生态重建及地域分异特征. 自然资源学报, 17(4): 430-437.]

[29] Xu Y, Yang B, Liu G B, et al. 2008. Topographic differentiationsimulation of crop yield and soil and water loss inthe Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(11):1218-1226. [徐勇, 杨波, 刘国彬, 等. 2008. 黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟.地理学报, 63(11):1218-1226.]

[30] Xu Y, Yang B, Tang Q, et al. 2011. Analysis of comprehensivebenefits of transforming slope farmland to terraces on the Loess Plateau: A case study of the Yangou watershed innorthern Shaanxi Province, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 8(3): 448-457.

[31] Zhou D Y, Yang H J. 2002. The game between central government,local governments and farmers in management of Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,22(3): 35-38. [周德翼, 杨海娟. 2002. 黄土高原治理中中央、地方、农民间的博弈分析. 水土保持通报, 22(3):35-38.]