地理科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1678-1684.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.12.013

• 区位与区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

主体功能区规划监管与评估的指标及其数据需求

王传胜1,2, 朱珊珊1,2, 樊杰1,2, 刘慧1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京100101;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-01 修回日期:2012-09-01 出版日期:2012-12-25 发布日期:2012-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 刘慧(1964-),女,研究员,主要研究领域为区域可持续发展。E-mail:liuh@igsnrr.ac.cn E-mail:liuh@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:王传胜(1965-),男,副研究员,主要研究方向为区域发展和区域规划。E-mail:wangcs@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划项目(2008BAH31B);国家自然科学基金重点项目(40830741)。

Key Indicators and Their Data Requirements for Supervision and Evaluation of MFOZ Planning

WANG Chuansheng1,2, ZHU Shanshan1,2, FAN Jie1,2, LIU Hui1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2012-03-01 Revised:2012-09-01 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-25

摘要: 主体功能区规划是建国以来首次在全国范围实施的精度较高的国土空间开发规划, 不仅对规划方法、技术手段有较高的要求, 而且对基于县级行政区域或更高精度空间尺度的规划数据源有较高的要求。本文针对省级主体功能区规划的9 个指标项, 分析了主体功能区规划的数据需求特征, 认为在数据支撑方面存在数据精度不够、缺少经济内涵、数据标准不统一、个别指标底层数据缺失4 个主要问题。基于主体功能区规划绩效评价及今后国土空间开发管治的目标要求, 提出了规划监管与评估的指标设计原则, 从集聚效应、社会发展、食物与资源保障、生态与环境保护4 个方面设计了主体功能区规划监管和评估的指标体系, 以期为“十二五”及今后全国国土空间功能发展的科学评估和数据系统建设提供参考依据。

关键词: 规划, 监管, 评估, 数据需求, 指标, 主体功能区

Abstract: MFOZ (Major Function Oriented Zoning) planning is a high precision strategic guideline for spatial development planning and land use management for a full nationwide implementation for the first time since 1949, which not only sets higher standards for the methodology, techniques and tools of planning, but also demands higher qualities of data sources for the planning in county-level administrative regions or in the spatial scales of even higher precision. By examining the 9 indicators for the province-level MFOZ planning, the characteristics of data requirements of MFOZ planning are analyzed, and four major issues in the data support aspect are discussed: (1) data lack precision, (2) data lack economic meanings, (3) data standards are not uniform, (4) original data for some indicators are missing. Based on the analysis of the performance review of MFOZ planning and future goals of spatial development and land use management, the authors propose the design principles of the indicators for supervision and evaluation of MFOZ planning, and put forward an indicator system from four aspects such as agglomeration effects, social development, food and resource supply, and ecology and environment protection. By doing so, the authors intend to provide a reference for scientific assessment of the nationwide land use management and spatial and functional development, and for establishment of the data system for MFOZ planning for the 12th five-year plan and the future years.

Key words: data requirement, evaluation, index, MFOZ, planning, supervision