区域尺度水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系以京津唐地区为例

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.09.003

地理科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1041-1048.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.09.003

• 能源与水资源保障风险 • 上一篇下一篇

区域尺度水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系以京津唐地区为例

李九一¹, 李丽娟¹, 柳玉梅^1,2, 梁丽乔¹, 李斌^1,2

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所|北京100101;
2. 中国科学院研究生院|北京100049

收稿日期:2010-01-01 修回日期:2010-05-01 出版日期:2010-09-25 发布日期:2010-09-25
通讯作者: 李丽娟(1961-)，女，吉林省吉林市人，研究员，博导，主要研究方向为水资源综合管理、生态需水理论与方法。 E-mail: lilj@igsnw.ac.cn. E-mail:lilj@igsnw.ac.cn
作者简介:李九一(1982-)|男|汉族|辽宁省建昌县人|助理研究员。主要研究方向为水资源保障及其风险评价与管理、生态需水理论与方法.E-mail: lijiuyi@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家科技支撑项目(2006BAD20B06);欧盟项目(SWITCH/WP5.2);中科院地理科学与资源研究所创新项目资助。

Framework for Water Scarcity Assessment and Solution at Regional Scales: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region

LI Jiuyi¹, LI Lijuan¹, LIU Yumei^1,2, LIANG Liqiao¹, LI Bin^1,2

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences&Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2010-01-01 Revised:2010-05-01 Online:2010-09-25 Published:2010-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水资源短缺风险评估是当今风险研究中的热点问题之一。然而，区域内部差异性使得区域尺度水资源短缺风险相比城市尺度更为复杂。本文构建了由水资源供给保障率、水资源保障可靠性、水资源利用率和水资源利用效率4项指标构成的区域尺度水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系，给出了定量计算方法，并在京津唐地区进行了实例研究。结果表明，2020年北京、天津、承德、张家口为“低风险”，秦皇岛为“中风险”，唐山、廊坊为“高风险”。京津唐地区水资源短缺风险防范对策应以节约用水、加强非常规水源利用为主，并加强区域内部调节，适度增加唐山等地的分水量。在廊坊市，应考虑降低复种指数减少农业用水需求。区域水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系能够直观反映区域水资源风险和规避风险的能力，揭示区域水资源短缺问题的特征，从而能更好地服务于水资源管理决策。

关键词: 风险决策, 风险评估, 京津唐地区, 水资源短缺

Abstract:

Water scarcity risk assessment is a research hotspot worldwide. Regional scale risk assessment is more complex than that at a city scale because of the internal differences. A water scarcity risk assessment and decision-making system as established at a regional level in this article, which constituted by four indexes, i.e. the demand satisfaction index, the demand reliability index, the rate of water resources utilization, and water-use efficiency. A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan region was conducted. The results show that the water scarcity risk level of Beijing, Tianjin, Chengde and Zhangjiakou is lower in 2020, better than the present situations. The risk level of Qinhuangdao is moderate, and that of Tangshan and Langfang is high. Saving water and unconventional water use should be wildely adopted in this region. Besides, water supply to Tangshan should be increased to reduce the water scarcity risk. In Langfeng, agricultural water demand should be decreased by reducing the multiple cropping indexes. This system can directly reflect the probability of water scarcity and the capacity to avoid risks. Reasonable water resource management decision -making can be made based on this study because the characteristics of regional water scarcity are clearly revealed by the four indexes.

Key words: Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan region, risk assessment, risk solution, water scarcity

李九一, 李丽娟, 柳玉梅, 梁丽乔, 李斌. 区域尺度水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系以京津唐地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(9): 1041-1048.

LI Jiuyi, LI Lijuan, LIU Yumei, LIANG Liqiao, LI Bin. Framework for Water Scarcity Assessment and Solution at Regional Scales: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(9): 1041-1048.

参考文献

[1] WHO. Water Sanitation and Health. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/en/. 2003.

[2] Falkenmark M, Lundquist J, Widsttand C. Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches: aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Natural Resources Forum, 1989, 13(4): 258-267.

[3] Ohlsson L, Appelgren B. Water and Social Resource Scarcity. Rome, Italy: FAO Issue Paper, 1998.

[4] Cosgrove WJ, Rijsberman F R. World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody's Business. London, UK: Earth- scan Publications, 2000.

[5] Sullivan C. Calculating a water poverty index. World De- velopment, 2002, 30(7): 1195-1211.

[6] Hashimoto T, Stedinger J R, Loucks D P. Reliability, re- siliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource sys- tem performance evaluation. Water Resources Research, 1982, 18(1): 14-20.

[7] Jinno K，Xu Z X, Kawamura A, et al. Risk assessment of a water supply system during drought. Water Resources Development, 1995, 11(2): 185-204.

[8] Xu Z X, Jinno K, Kawamura A, et al. Performance risk analysis for Fukuoka water supply system. Water Re- sources Management, 1998, 12(1):13-30.

[9] Kawamura A, Merabtene T, Jinno K. Development of In- tegrated Decision Support System for the Water Supply System in Fukuoka, Japan//Water 99 Joint Congress. 25th Hydrology & Water Resources Symposium, 2nd Interna- tional Conference on Water Resources & Environment Research; Burton, ACT: Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1999: 341-347.

[10] Merabtene T, Kawamura A, Jinno K, et al. Risk assess- ment for optimal drought management of an integrated wa- tee resources system using a genetic algorithm. Hydrologi- cal Processes, 2002, 16(11): 2189-2208.

[11] Jones R N, Page C M, Hereon N, et al. Climate change and the risk to long-term water supply in the Murray- Darling Basin//Australian Water Association. Proceeding of 2001 A Water Odyssey, 2001.

[12] Jones R N, Page C M. Assessing the risk of Climate Change on the Water Resources of the Macquarie River Catchment//Ghassemi F, Whetton P, Little R, et al. Inte- grating Models for Natural Resources Management across Disciplines, issues and scales(Part 2). Modsim 2001 Inter- national Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, 2001: 673-678.

[13] Jones R N, Pittock A B. Climate change and water re- sources in an arid continent: Managing uncertainty and risk in Austtalial/ Beniston M. Climatic Change -Implica- dons for the Hydrological Cycle and for Water Manage- ment. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, 2002: 465-501.

[14] Fowler H J, Kilsby C G, 0'Connell P E. Modeling the im- pacts of climatic change and variability on the reliability, resilience, and vulnerability of a water resource system. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(8): 1222-1232.

[15] Jones R, Preston B, Brooke C, et al. Climate change and Australian water resources: First risk assessment and gap analysis. Canberra, Australian: Austtalian Greenhouse Of- fice and the National Water Commission, 2007.

[16] Iglesias A, Moneo M, Garrote L, et al. Drought and water scarcity: current and future vulnerability and risk//Garrido A，Llamas M R. Water policy in Spain, resources for the future. Washington D C, 2006.

[17] Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, et al. Challenges to man- age the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resources Management, 2007, 21 (5):775-788.

[18] 阮本清，韩宇平，王浩，等.水资源短缺风险的模糊综合评价.水利学报，2005, 36(8): 906-912.

[19] 韩宇平，阮本清.水资源短缺风险经济损失评估研究. 水利学报，2007, 38(10): 1253-1257.

[20] 韩宇平，许拯民.区域水资源短缺风险调控研究.河北工业大学学报，2007, 24(4): 81-84.

[21] 韩宇平，李志杰，赵庆民.区域水资源短缺风险决策研究.华北水利水电学院学报，2008, 29(1): 1-3.

[22] 韩宇平，阮本清，汪党献.区域水资源短缺的多口标风险决策模型研究.水利学报，2008, 39(6): 667-673.

[23] 马黎，汪党献.我国缺水风险分布状况及其对策.中国水利水电科学研究院学报，2008, 6(2): 131-135.

[24] 刘登伟.京津冀大都市]I水资源短缺风险评价.水利发展研究，2010, 10(1): 20-24.

[25] Draper A J, Jenkins MW，Kirby KW，et al. Economic- engineering optimization for California water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2003, 129(3): 155一164

[26] Newlin B D, Jenkins MW，Lund J R, et al. Southern Cal- ifornia water markets: Potential and limitations. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2002, 128(1): 21-32.

[27] Jenkins MW，Lund J R, Howitt R E, et al. Optimization of California's water system: Results and insights. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2004, 130(4): 127一136.

[28] Null S, Lund J R. Re-Assembling hetch hetchy: Water supply implications of removing 0'Shaughnessy Dam. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2006, 42(4): 395-408.

[29] Harou J J, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg D E, et al. Hydro -economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 375 (3): 627-643.

[30] Medellin-Azuara J, Mendoza-Espinosa L G, Lund J R, et al. Virtues of simple hydro -economic optimization: Baja California, Mexico. Environmental Management, 2009, 90 (11): 3470-3478.

[31] Gleick P H. Global Freshwater resources: Soft-path solu- dons for the 21st century. Science, 2003, 302: 1524- 1528.

[32] Martin-Carrasco F J, Garrote L. Drought-induced Water Scarcity in Water Resources Systems. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2007, 78(4): 301- 311.

[33] Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Rosch T. World water in 2025: global modeling and scenario analysis//Rijsberman F R. World Water Scenarios Analyses. London, UK: Earthscan Publications, 2000.

[34] 张士锋，贾绍凤.海河流域水量平衡与水资源安全问题研究.自然资源学报，2003, 18(6): 684-691.
[3s] 任宪韶，户作亮，曹寅自，等.海河流域水资源评价.北京:中国水利水电出版社，2007.

[36] 金凤君.华北平原城市用水问题研究.地理科学进展， 2000, 19(1): 17-24.

[37] 刘昌明，陈志恺.中国水资源现状评价和供需发展趋势分析.北京:中国水利水电出版社，2001.

[38] 河北省水利厅.河北省水资源评价，2004.

[39] 北京市南水北调工程建设委员会办公室.北京市南水北调配套工程总体规划.北京:中国水利水电出版社， 2008.

[40] 李九一.中国水资源短缺及其风险评价与管理对策研究.北京:中国科学院研究生院，2009.

区域尺度水资源短缺风险评估与决策体系以京津唐地区为例

Framework for Water Scarcity Assessment and Solution at Regional Scales: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	方佳毅, 史培军. 全球气候变化背景下海岸洪水灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[2]	张会, 李铖, 程炯, 吴志峰, 吴艳艳. 基于“H-E-V”框架的城市洪涝风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[3]	张宁, 王大为. 基于风险地形建模的毒品犯罪风险评估和警务预测[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1131-1139.
[4]	孟晖, 李春燕, 张若琳, 李亚民. 京津冀地区县域单元地质灾害风险评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 327-334.
[5]	扈海波. 城市暴雨积涝灾害风险突增效应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9): 1075-1086.
[6]	崔鹏, 邹强. 山洪泥石流风险评估与风险管理理论与方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(2): 137-147.
[7]	方伟华, 林伟. 面向灾害风险评估的台风风场模型研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(6): 852-867.
[8]	李颖, 方伟华. 热带气旋降水模拟研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(4): 606-617.
[9]	张卫星, 周洪建. 灾害链风险评估的概念模型——以汶川5·12特大地震为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(1): 130-144.
[10]	刘光旭, 戴尔阜, 吴绍洪, 吴文祥. 泥石流灾害风险评估理论与方法研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 383-391.
[11]	张学霞, 武鹏飞, 刘奇勇. 基于空间聚类分析的松辽流域水资源利用风险评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(9): 1032-1040.
[12]	温家洪,Jianping Yan,尹占娥,孟庆洁,叶欣梁. 中国地震灾害风险管理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(7): 771-777.
[13]	国志兴,钟兴春,方伟华,曹鑫,林伟. 野火蔓延灾害风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(7): 778-788.
[14]	李娜, 郭怀成. 农业非点源磷流失潜在风险评价——磷指数法研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(11): 1360-1367.
[15]	赵庆良,许世远,王军,胡蓓蓓,叶明武,刘耀龙. 沿海城市风暴潮灾害风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 32-40.