流域生态健康评价理论与方法研究进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.01.002

地理科学进展 ›› 2008, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 9-17.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.01.002

流域生态健康评价理论与方法研究进展

李春晖^1,2, 崔嵬¹, 庞爱萍², 郑小康^1,2

1. 北京师范大学环境学院水沙科学教育部重点实验室,北京100875
2. 北京师范大学环境学院水环境模拟国家重点实验室,北京100875

收稿日期:2007-09-01 修回日期:2007-12-01 出版日期:2008-01-25 发布日期:2008-01-25
作者简介:李春晖(1976- ),男,安徽阜阳人,教授,博士.主要研究领域为水资源、流域管理和生态健康等. E- mail:chunhuili@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金[50709002 和50509002]和国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2006CB4033).

Progr ess on Theor ies and Methods of Water shed Eco- health Assessment

LI Chunhui^1,2, CUI Wei¹, PANG Aiping², ZHENG Xiaokang^1,2

1. Key Lab of Water and Sand Science, Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2007-09-01 Revised:2007-12-01 Online:2008-01-25 Published:2008-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对流域进行生态健康评价，将为流域的规划、管理和保护以及流域综合治理提供决策依据。本文回顾了国内外流域生态健康评价的历史和现状，着重阐述了流域生态系统健康评价的尺度与方法。流域生态系统健康评价主要有两种方法：一是生物监测法，二是指标体系法。对流域进行生态健康评价，重点在于建立评价指标体系。流域生态健康评价的指标体系应该包括生物、水质、水文、栖息地、社会经济和人类健康等六方面指标。最后，明确指标选取的基本原则，并指出了目前流域生态健康评价存在的问题及今后的研究趋势。

关键词: 进展, 流域, 评价, 生态健康

Abstract:

Watershed ecosystem is a social- economic- natural complex ecosystem. Watershed eco-health assessment can help watershed layout, protection and comprehensive management, and can provide basis for decision- making. In this paper, the concept and characteristics of watershed eco- health are introduced, and the history, current condition and research scale of watershed ecohealth assessment are put forward. The assessment should be carried out from broad temporal-spatial scales. This research summarizes methods of watershed eco- health assessment in the past years both at home and abroad. There are two main methods: one is biological assessment and the other is indices assessment. It should be careful in selecting bio- indicator species because the sensitivity and reliability of species need to be considered simultaneously. The indices should include six categories: bio- assessment, water condition assessment, hydrological assessment, habitat assessment, social- economic assessment and human health assessment. Every category has some relative indices. Because of the complexity of watershed ecosystem, the measures of watershed eco- health indices are difficult sometimes. The measurement methods should be further developed. Ecosystem restoration is needed for those unhealthy watershed ecosystems and methods of it are introduced. Watershed eco- health assessment is a developing theory system and there are some problems that should be further discussed in this field. Last, these problems and research trends in future are pointed out.

Key words: assessment, eco- health, progress, watershed

李春晖,崔嵬,庞爱萍,郑小康. 流域生态健康评价理论与方法研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(1): 9-17.

LI Chunhui, CUI Wei, PANG Aiping, ZHENG Xiaokang. Progr ess on Theor ies and Methods of Water shed Eco- health Assessment[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 27(1): 9-17.

参考文献

[1] 罗初跃, 周忠轩, 孙轶等. 流域生态系统健康评价方法. 生态学报, 2003, 23(8):1606~1614.

[2] 於琍, 曹明奎, 李克让. 全球气候变化背景下生态系统的脆弱性评价. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1):61~69.

[3] 燕乃玲, 虞孝感. 生态系统完整性研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(1):17~25.

[4] 吴刚, 蔡庆华. 流域生态学研究内容的整体表述. 生态学报, 1998, 18(6):575~581.

[5] 陈星, 周成虎. 生态安全:国内外研究综述. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(6):8~20.

[6] 龙笛, 张思聪, 樊朝宇. 流域生态系统健康评价研究. 资源科学, 2006, 28(4):38~43.

[7] Rapport D J. Evolution of indicators of ecosystem health. In:Daniel, H.(eds). Ecological Indicators. Barking: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1992, 121~134.

[8] Robert C. Ecological economic issuse and considerations in indicator development, selection, and use: toward an operational definition of system health. In:Daniel, H.(eds). Ecological Indicators. Barking: Elsevier Science Publi - shers Ltd, 1992, 1491~1502.

[9] Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J. Assessing Ecosystem Health. Trends Ecol Evolu, 1998, (13):397 ~ 402.

[10] Meyer J L. S tream health:incorporating thee human dimension to advance stream ecology .Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1997, (16):439~447.

[11] 杨文慧, 严忠民, 吴建华. 河流健康评价的研究进展. 河海大学学报, 2005, 33(6):607~610.

[12] Karr J R, Chuew. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia, 2000, (422):1~14.

[13] Schofield N J, Davies P E. Measuring the health of our rivers. Water, 1996, 5(6):39~43.

[14] 崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(3):31~36.

[15] Borman F H. Ecology: A personal history. An Review Energy and Environ, 1996, (21):1~29.

[16] Rapport D J. Ecosystem health:Exploring the territory. Ecosystem Health, 1995, 1(1):5~13.

[17] Bundi U, Peter A, Frutiger A, et al. Scientific base and modular concept for comprehensive assessment of streams in Switzerland. Hydrobioloia, 2000, (422/423):477~487.

[18] 马克明，孔红梅，关文彬等. 生态系统健康评价:方法与方向. 生态学报，2001, 21(12):2106~2116.

[19] 刘明华, 董贵华. RS 和GIS 支持下的秦皇岛地区生态系统健康评价. 地理研究，2006, 25(5):930~938.

[20] 赵彦伟, 杨志峰. 河流健康:概念、评价方法与方向. 地理科学，2005, 25(1):119~122.

[21] 唐涛，蔡庆华，刘建康. 河流生态系统健康及其评价. 应用生态学报，2002, 13(9):1191~1194.

[22] Kingsford R T. Aerial survey of water birds on wetlands as a measure of river and flood plain health. Freshwater Bi-ology,1999, (41):425~438.

[23] Kleynhans C J. The development of a fish index to assess the biological integrity of South African rivers. Water S A, 1999, (25):265~278.

[24] 日本水道协会. 上水试验法. 东京:日本水道协会出版社, 1970.

[25] Marsden M W, Smith M R, Sargent R J. Trophic state of rivers in the Forth catchment, Scotland. Aquat. Cons., 1997, (2):211~221.

[26] Kwandrans J, Eloranta P, Kawecka B, et al. Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland.Appl. Phycol., 1998, (10):193~201.

[27] Woodiwiss F S. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent River Board .Chem.Ind., 1964,(5): 443~447.

[28] Chutter F M. Research on the Rapid Biological Assessment of Water Quality Impacts in Stream and Rivers.WRC Report No422/1/98. Water Research Commission,Pretoria, 1998.

[29] Pavluk T I. Development of an index of trophic comp leteness for benthic macro- invertebrate communities in flowing waters. Hydrobiologia，2000，(427):135~141.

[30] 黄玉瑶. 内陆水域污染生态学- 原理与应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.

[31] Townsend C R, Riley R H. Assessment of river health:accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space .Freshwater Biology，1999，(41):393~405.

[32] 孔红梅，赵景柱，姬兰柱等. 生态系统健康评价方法初探. 应用生态学报，2002，13(4):486~490.

[33] 董仁哲. 国外河流健康评估技术. 水利水电技术, 2005, (11):15~19.

[34] Roux D J, Van Vliet H R and Van Veelen M. Towards integrated water quality monitoring: Assessment of ecosystem health. Water S.A., 1993,19(4):275~280.

[35] Munkittrick K R and McCarty L S. An integrated approach to aquatic ecosystem health: Top - down, bottom - up or middle- out? Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health,1995,4 (2):77~90.

[36] Schaeffer D J and Novak E W. Integrating epidemiology and epizootiology information in ecotoxicology studies3. Ecosystem health. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 1988, 16(3):232~241.

[37] Rapport D J. State of Ecosystem Medicine. Contaminant Effects on Fisheries, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984, 315~324.

[38] Cairns J Jr, McCormick P V and Niederlehner B R. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia，1993，263(1):1~44.

[39] 王治良，王国祥. 洪泽湖湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系探讨. 中国生态农业学报，2007，15(6):152~155.

[40] Cude C G. Oregon water quality index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association，2001，37(1):125~ 137.

[41] 殷会娟, 冯耀龙. 河流生态环境健康评价方法研究. 中国农村水利水电，2006,(4):55~57.

[42] Barbour M T. Rapid Bioassessment protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable River Peiiphyton Benthic Macroinvertehrates and Fish. 2ndedn, EPA 841- B- 99,USEPA, 1999.

[43] Cairns J, McCormick P V, Niederlehner B R. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia，1993，(263):1~44.

[44] 陈静生，夏星辉. 中国河流水化学研究进展. 地理科学， 1999, 19(4):290~294.

[45] 林木隆，李向阳，杨明海. 珠江流域河流健康评价指标体系初探. 人民珠江, 2006,(4):1~4.

[46] 陈铭，张树清，王志强等. 基于GIS 的蛟流河流域湿地生态系统健康评价. 农业系统科学与综合研究， 2006，22(3):165~168.

流域生态健康评价理论与方法研究进展

Progr ess on Theor ies and Methods of Water shed Eco- health Assessment

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈睿山, 赵志强, 徐迪, 陈轶. 城市和城市群可持续发展指数研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[2]	胡国建, 陆玉麒. 基于企业视角的城市网络研究进展、思考和展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596.
[3]	任嘉敏, 马延吉. 地理学视角下绿色发展研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1196-1209.
[4]	严正宵, 夏军, 宋进喜, 赵玲玲, 庞国伟. 中小流域设计暴雨雨型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1224-1235.
[5]	齐文平, 王艳慧, 万圆, 黄涛. 基于G-TOPSIS模型的贫困农户多目标发展评价——以云南福贡县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 1024-1036.
[6]	张永勇, 陈秋潭. 淮河中上游流域洪水主要类型及其时空分布特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 627-635.
[7]	胡庆芳, 曹士圯, 杨辉斌, 王银堂, 李伶杰, 王立辉. 汉江流域安康站日径流预测的LSTM模型初步研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 636-642.
[8]	熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 向宁, 王博. 地缘政治风险研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[9]	黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 刘超, 张益宾, 郝晋珉, 王惠. “生产-生活-生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.
[10]	宋周莺, 虞洋. “一带一路”沿线贸易便利化发展格局研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 355-366.
[11]	邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 298-309.
[12]	王晓楠, 孙威. 黄河流域资源型城市转型效率及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1643-1655.
[13]	杨俊, 由浩琳, 张育庆, 金翠. 从传统数据到大数据+的人居环境研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 166-176.
[14]	姜凯斯,刘正佳,李裕瑞,王永生,王昱. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型村域土地利用变化及对区域乡村转型发展的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1305-1315.
[15]	赖锡军. 流域水环境过程综合模拟研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1123-1135.