可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.05.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可达性一直是地理学、土木建筑工程设计、交通运输经济学等学科的研究热点。已有的各种可达性度量方法目前已广泛应用于交通网络与城镇发展研究、交通基础设施的区域经济效应评价、选址分析、园林景观规划、社会文化等多个研究领域。随着应用需求的持续加大和技术研究的不断深入, 可达性度量方法也在快速发展, 其度量体系正在形成。本文首先从两个层面对可达性的涵义进行全面阐述; 在此基础上, 从网络特性的角度对拓扑法、距离法、累积机会法、等值线法、重力模型法、平衡系数法、时空法、效用法等目前常用的可达性度量方法进行系统分类, 并且从可达性影响因素入手对各种度量方法进行综合比较与评述; 然后, 针对不同的应用领域, 对各种度量方法的应用研究现状进行详细论述与剖析; 最后, 对可达性研究的发展方向进行深入讨论与展望。

关键词: 度量, 进展, 可达性, 评价

Abstract:

Accessibility is a research topic in the field of geography, civil engineering and transportation economics. Currently, a range of accessibility measurement approaches have been widely used in transportation network and urban development planning, transportation infrastructure effects evaluation on regional economy, location- allocation researches, landscape planning, social culture researches, to name a few. With rapid increasing of application demands and unceasing development of technology researches, accessibility measurement approaches also develop swiftly and the methodology is being formed. Based on a comprehensive exposition of accessibility concept, this paper systematically discusses the state - of- arts of accessibility measurement approaches, carries out a classification of these approaches from the perspective of network characteristics, and comparably elaborates and evaluates these approaches according to their influencing factors. Then application of various approaches are discoursed and analyzed in detail, consistent with different application areas. Finally the research priorities of accessibility research are thoroughly discussed.

Key words: accessibility, evaluation, measurement, state- of- arts

陈洁,陆锋,程昌秀. 可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 100-110.

CHEN Jie,LU Feng,CHENG Changxiu. Advance in Accessibility Evaluation Approaches and Applications[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 26(5): 100-110.

参考文献

[1] 陆大道. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.

[2] Dupuy G. Stransky V. Cities and highway network in Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(2): 107~121.

[3] Li Siming, Shum Yiman. Impacts of the national truck highway system on accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 2001, 9(1): 39~48.

[4] 曹小曙, 薛德升, 阎小培. 中国干线公路网络联结的城市通达性. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 903~910.

[5] 金凤君, 王娇娥. 20 世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 293~302.

[6] 金凤君. 我国航空客流网络发展及其地域系统研究. 地理研究, 2001, 20(1): 31~39.

[7] 吴威, 曹有挥, 曹卫东等. 长江三角洲公路网络的可达性空间格局及其演化. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1065~1074.

[8] 张莉, 陆玉麒. 基于陆路交通网的区域可达性评价———以长江三角洲为例. 地理学报, 2006, 61(12): 1235~1246.

[9] 罗鹏飞, 徐逸伦, 张楠楠. 高速铁路对区域可达性的影响研究———以沪宁地区为例. 经济地理, 2004, 24(3): 407~411.

[10] 徐旳, 陆玉麒. 高等级公路网建设对区域可达性的影响———以江苏省为例. 经济地理, 2004, 24(6): 830~833.

[11] 张兵, 金凤君, 于良. 湖南公路网络演变的可达性评价. 经济地理, 2006, 26(5): 776~779.

[12] 李平华, 陆玉麟. 可达性研究的回顾与展望. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(3): 69~77.

[13] Linneker B. Spence N. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(2): 77~92

[14] Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A. High- speed rail transit impact on regional systems: does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion? The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31: 77~98

[15] Gutierrez J. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high- speed line Madrid- Barcelona- French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 2001, 9: 229~242

[16] Moseley MJ. Accessibility: the rural challenge. London: Methuen, 1979.

[17] Dobson J. A regional screening procedure for land use suitability analysis. The Geographical Review, 1979, 69: 224~234.

[18] Owen S H, Daskin MS. Strategic facility location: a review. European Journal of Operational Research,1998,111: 423~447.

[19] 刘家明, 刘爱利, 陈田. 滑雪旅游开发布局影响因素与对策研究———以内蒙古自治区滑雪旅游开发为例. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(5): 105~112.

[20] 张文忠, 刘旺, 孟斌. 北京市区居住环境的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 115~121.

[21] 张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法. 地理科学, 2007, 27(1): 17~23.

[22] 张颖, 王铮, 周嵬等. 韦伯型设施区位的可计算模型及其应用. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1057~1064.

[23] 江斌, 黄波, 陆锋. GIS 环境下的空间分析和地学视觉化. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002, 44~45.

[24] Chen J, Lu F. Analysis of Spatial Configuration of the Palace Museum: An Application of the Axial- Based Space Syntax, In Proceedings of Geoinformatics, October 28~29, 2006.

[25] 卡莫纳等编著, 冯江等译. 城市设计的维度. 江苏: 百通集团江苏科学技术出版社, 2005, 165~169.

[26] 汪明峰, 宁越敏. 城市的网络优势———中国互联网骨干网络结构与节点可达性分析. 地理研究, 2006, 25(2): 193~203.

[27] 凯文·林奇著. 林庆怡, 陈朝晖, 邓华译. 城市形态. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001, 133~144.

[28] Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of 'small- world'networks. Nature, 1998, 393: 440~442.

[29] 邓肯·J·瓦茨著. 陈禹等译. 有序与无序之间的网络动力学. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. 2006. 137~160.

[30] Kwan M- P, Murray A T, O'Kelly M E. Tiefelsdorf M. Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications, Journal of Geographical Systems, 2003, 5: 129~138.

[31] 杨家文, 周一星. 通达性: 概念, 度量及应用. 地理学与国土研究, 1999, 15(2): 61~66.

[32] Liu Suxia, Zhu Xuan. Accessibility analyst: An integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B, 2004, 31(1): 105~124.

[33] 杨育军. 可达性评价的比较研究与应用. 同济大学硕士学位论文, 2004, 17~32.

[34] Sakkas N. Pérez J. Elaborating metrics for the accessibility of buildings. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2006, 30: 661~685.

[35] Vickerman R W. Accessibility attraction and potential: a review of concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environment and Planning A, 1974, 6: 675~691.

[36] Weibull J W. An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1976, 6: 357~379.

[37] Koenig J G. Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation, 1980, 9: 145~172.

[38] Geertman S C M, Ritsema Van Eck J R. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning International Journal of Geographical Information System, 1995, 9(1): 67~80.

[39] Transportation Statistics Annual Report (TSAR). Bureau of Transportation Statistics, US Department of Transportation, 1999.

[40] 钮心毅. GIS 支持下的城市中可达性的评价方法. 同济大学硕士学位论文, 1999.

[41] Ingram D R. The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form. Regional Studies, 1971, 5: 1012~1076.

[42] Baxter R S, Leniz G. The measurement of relative accessibility. Regional Studies, 1975, 9: 15~26.

[43] Kirby H R. Accessibility indices for abstract road networks. Regional Studies, 1976, 10: 479~482.

[44] Wachs M, Kumagai T G. Physical accessibility as social indicator. Socio- Economic Planning Science, 1973, 7: 437~456.

[45] Breheny MJ. The measurement of spatial opportunity in strategic planning. Regional Studies, 1978, 12: 463~479.

[46] 周一星. 城市地理学. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003. 359, 362.

[47] 宋小冬, 钮心毅. 再论居民出行可达性的计算机辅助评价. 城市规划汇刊, 2000, 3: 18~22.

[48] Wilson A G. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1967, 1: 253~269.

[49] Wilson A G. A family of spatial interaction models and associated developments. Environment and Planning, 1971, 3(1): 1~32.

[50] Fotheringham A S. A new set of spatial- interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A, 1983, 15: 15~36.

[51] 姚士谋, 王书国, 陈爽等. 区域发展中“城市群现象”的空间系统探索. 经济地理, 2006, 26(5): 726~730.

[52] H#gerstrand T. “What about people in regional science?”Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1970, 24: 7~21.

[53] Miller H J. Modeling accessibility using space- time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Systems, 1991, 5(3): 287~301.

[54] Miller H J. Measuring Space- Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures, Geographical Analysis, 1999,31(2): 187~212.

[55] Yu H, Shaw S- L. Revisiting H#gerstrand's time- geographic framework for individual activities in the age of instant access. Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant Access. The Netherlands: Springer Science, 2007, 103~118.

[56] Koenig J G. A theory of urban accessibility. Proceedings of PTRC, Summer Annual Meeting, 1975.

[57] Gauthier H L. Transportation and the growth of the Sao Paulo economy. Journal of Regional Science, 1968, 8(1): 77~94.

[58] Wheeler D C. O'Kelly M E. Network topology and city accessibility of the commercial Internet. Professional Geographer, 1999, 51(3): 327~339.

[59] O'Kelly M E. Grubesic T H. Backbone topology, access and the commercial Internet, 1997~2000. Environment and Planning B, 2002, 29(4): 533~552.

[60] Hillier B. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 82,88~143.

[61] Jiang B, Claramunt C, Batty M. Geometric Accessibility and Geographic Information: Extending Desktop GIS To Space Syntax. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1999, 23: 127 ~146.

[62] 陈述彭. 台风防灾减灾信息系统. 地球信息科学, 2006, 8(4): 1~3.

[63] 王德, 刘锴. 上海市一日交流圈的空间特征和动态变化研究. 城市规划汇刊, 2003, 3: 3~10.

[64] 王德, 刘锴, 郭洁. 沪宁杭三市一日交流圈的空间特征及其比较. 城市规划汇刊, 2004, 3: 33~38.

[65] Hansen W G. How accessibility shapes land- use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959, 25: 73~76.

[66] Clark C, Wilson F, Bradley F. Industrial location and economic potential in Western Europe. Regional Studies, 1969, 3(2): 197~212.

[67] Keeble D, Owens P L, Thompson C. Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community. Regional Studies, 1981,16(6): 419~432.

[68] 宋小冬, 廖雄赳. 基于GIS 的空间相互作用模型在城镇发展研究中的应用. 城市规划汇刊, 2003, 3: 45~51.

[69] Lakshmanan T R,Hansen W G. A Retail market Potential Model. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1965, 31: 134~143.

[70] Fotheringham A S. Modelling Hierarchical Destination Choice. Environment and Planning A, 1986, 18: 401~418.

[71] Recker W W, Chen C. McNally M G. Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains. Transportation Research A, 2001, 35: 339~369.

[72] Muraco W A. Intraurban Accessibility. Economic Geography, 1972, 48: 388~405.

[73] 项琳斐. 玛格丽特城镇中心. 世界建筑, 2005, 11: 56~59.

[74] 项琳斐. 英国国家卫生部医院病房设计. 世界建筑, 2005, 11: 70~71.