平缓地区地形湿度指数的计算方法

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.06.010

地理科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 87-93.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.06.010

平缓地区地形湿度指数的计算方法

秦承志¹, 杨琳¹, 朱阿兴^1,2, 李宝林¹, 裴韬¹, 周成虎¹

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京100101|
2. Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

收稿日期:2006-06-01 修回日期:2006-09-01 出版日期:2006-11-25 发布日期:2006-11-25
作者简介:秦承志( 1977- )| 男, 山东蒙阴人, 博士, 副研究员, 主要从事数字地形分析研究. E- mail: qincz@lreis.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目( 40501056) ; 中国科学院"百人计划"项目; 中国科学院创新团队国际合作伙伴计划"人类活动与生态系统变化"(CXTD- Z2005- 1) .

Computation Method of Topogr aphic Wetness Index in Low Relief Ar ea

QIN Chengzhi¹, YANG Lin¹, ZHU A- Xing^1,2, LI Baolin¹, PEI Tao¹, ZHOU Chenghu¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China|
2. Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Received:2006-06-01 Revised:2006-09-01 Online:2006-11-25 Published:2006-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

地形湿度指数( topographic wetness index) 可定量模拟流域内土壤水分的干湿状况，在流域的土壤及分布式水文模型等研究中具有重要的意义。但现有的地形湿度指数计算方法在应用于地形平缓地区时会得到明显不合理的结果，即在河谷地区内，地形湿度指数仅在狭窄的汇水线上数值较高，而在汇水线以外的位置则阶跃式地变为异常低的地形湿度指数值。本文针对此问题对地形湿度指数的计算方法提出改进: 以多流向算法MFD- fg 计算汇水面积，相应地以最大下坡计算地形湿度指数，再基于一个正态分布函数对河谷平原地区内的地形湿度指数进行插值处理。应用结果表明，所得地形湿度指数的空间分布不但能合理地反映平缓地区坡面上的水分分布状况，并且在河谷地区内地形湿度指数值也都比较高，其空间分布呈平滑过渡，因而整个研究区域的水分分布状况得到了比较合理的反映。

关键词: DEM, 插值, 地形湿度指数, 多流向算法, 平缓地区, 最大下坡

Abstract:

Topographic wetness index, which is designed for modeling the status ( “dry”or “wet”) of the soil moisture quantitatively, is an important index for both predictive soil mapping and distributed hydrological modeling in a catchment. Current methods for calculating topographic wetness index have evident problems when applied in low relief area. Outside the positions of narrow accumulation line with high topographic wetness index, the topographic wetness index dramatically jumps down in other parts of wide valley area. This is unreasonable because the soil moisture should be comparatively average and high in the wide and flat valley, and the value of topographic wetness index should be high. This problem is caused by both the flow accumulation algorithm and the slope gradient used during computing the topographic wetness index. A new method for computing topographic wetness index is proposed in this paper to address this problem. Firstly, flow accumulation is calculated by a multiple flow direction algorithm (MFD- fg). Topographic wetness index is then computed by the flow accumulation and maximum downslope. The maximum downslope used in the computation of topographic wetness index is matched with the idea of both MFD- fg and topographic wetness index. Furthermore, a post - processing method is also proposed to compute the topographic wetness index in valley area. The topographic wetness index in the valley area is interpolated by a Gaussian function based on the value of the topographic wetness index on the nearest position on extracted flow accumulation line. The application in a small watershed shows that the method proposed in this paper can get a comparatively reasonable distribution of topographic wetness index for not only the hillslope but also the wide valley area. The value of topographic wetness index in valley area is averagely high and with a smooth transition, which reflects the natural status of the soil moisture in application area. In the future research, the method proposed in this paper will be evaluated by both artificial surfaces and the real applications.

Key words: digital elevation model (DEM), interpolation, low relief area, maximum downslope, multiple flow direction algorithm, topographic wetness index

中图分类号:

P343

秦承志,杨琳,朱阿兴,李宝林,裴韬,周成虎. 平缓地区地形湿度指数的计算方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(6): 87-93.

QIN Chengzhi,YANG Lin,ZHU A- Xing,LI Baolin,PEI Tao,ZHOU Chenghu. Computation Method of Topogr aphic Wetness Index in Low Relief Ar ea[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 25(6): 87-93.

参考文献

[1] Kirkby M J. Hydrograph modeling strategies. In: Peel R, Chisholm M, Haggett P, eds. Process in Physical and Human Geography. Oxford: Heinemann, 1975, 69~90.

[2] O’Loughlin E M. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour. Res., 1986, 22(5): 794~804.

[3] Beven K J, Kirkby N J. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydro. Sci. Bull., 1979, 24 (1): 43~69.

[4] Wolock D M, Hornberger G M, Musgrove T J. Topographic effects on flow path and surface water chemistry of the Llyn Brianne catchments in Wales. J. Hydrol., 1990, 115: 243~259.

[5] Moore I, Gessler P, Nielsen G, et al. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1993, 57(2): 443~452.

[6] 邓慧平, 李秀彬. 地形指数的物理意义分析. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21( 2) : 103~110.

[7] 孔凡哲, 芮孝芳. 基于地形特征的流域水文相似性. 地理研究, 2003, 22( 6) : 709~715.

[8] 张彩霞, 杨勤科, 李锐. 基于DEM的地形湿度指数及其应用研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24( 6) : 116~123.

[9] Ambroise B, Beven K J, Freer J. Towards a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts: Topographic indices of hydrologic similarity. Water Resour. Res., 1996, 32(7): 2135~2145.

[10] Quinn P, Beven K J, Lamb R. The ln (α/tanβ) index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework. Hydrol. Process., 1995, 9: 161~182.

[11] 熊立华, 郭生练, O’Connor K. 利用DEM提取地貌指数的方法述评. 水科学进展, 2002, 13( 6) : 775~780.

[12] Güntner A, Seibert J, Uhlenbrook S. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: An evaluation of different terrain indices. Water Resour. Res., 2004, 40, W05114, doi:10.1029/2003WR002864.

[13] Quinn P, Beven K, Chevalier P, et al. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process., 1991, 5: 59~79.

[14] Wolock D M, McCabe G J. Comparison of single and multiple flow direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters. Water Resour. Res., 1995, 31(5): 1315~1324.

[15] Pan F, Peters- Lidard C, Sale M, et al. A comparison of geographical information system- based algorithms for computing the TOPMODEL topographic index. Water Resour. Res., 2004, 40, W06303, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003069.

[16] 秦承志, 朱阿兴, 李宝林等. 基于栅格DEM的多流向算法述评. 地学前缘, 2006, 13( 3) : 91~98.

[17] Sorensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci. Discuss., 2005, 2: 1807~1834.

[18] 孔凡哲, 芮孝芳. 一种地形指数计算方法在Topmodel 洪水模拟计算中的应用. 水文, 2003, 23( 3) : 16~19.

[19] Hjerdt K, McDonnell J, Seibert J, et al. A new topographic index to quantify downslope controls on local drainage. Water Resour. Res., 2004, 40, W05602, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003130.

[20] Burrough P A, van Gaans P F M, MacMillan R A. High- resolution landform classification using fuzzy k- means. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113: 37~52.

[21] 秦承志, 李宝林, 朱阿兴等. 水流分配策略随下坡坡度变化的多流向算法. 水科学进展, 2006, 17( 4) : 450~456.

[22] Planchon O, Darboux F. A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models. Catena, 2001, 46(2- 3): 159~176.

[23] Zhang W, Montgomery D R. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resour. Res., 1994, 30(4): 1019~1028.

平缓地区地形湿度指数的计算方法

Computation Method of Topogr aphic Wetness Index in Low Relief Ar ea

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	陈慕琳, 蔡红艳. VIIRS/DNB夜间灯光月度产品插补方法对比——以北京为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 126-138.
[2]	徐亚莉, 罗明良, 梁倍瑜, 昌小莉, 向卫, 张斌. DEM空间插值方法对土壤侵蚀模拟的影响研究——以USPED分析干热河谷典型冲沟为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(7): 870-877.
[3]	赵明伟, 岳天祥. 高精度曲面建模方法研究进展与分类[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(4): 401-408.
[4]	刘翠玲, 龙瀛. 京津冀地区城镇空间扩张模拟与分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(2): 217-.
[5]	张欣欣. 数字高程模型在活动断层位置及地表变形变位特征提取研究中的应用[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(10): 1288-1296.
[6]	李月臣, 何志明, 刘春霞. 基于站点观测数据的气温空间化方法评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1019-1028.
[7]	呼雪梅, 秦承志. 地形信息对确定DEM适宜分辨率的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(1): 50-56.
[8]	仝迟鸣, 周成虎, 程维明, 张文杰, 王娇, 刘海江. 基于DEM的黄土塬形态特征分析及发育阶段划分[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(1): 42-49.
[9]	盛美玲, 方海燕. WaTEM/SEDEM模型及其应用研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(1): 85-91.
[10]	田瑞云, 王玉宽, 傅斌, 刘援. 基于DEM的地形单元多样性指数及其算法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(1): 121-129.
[11]	赵娜, 岳天祥, 王晨亮. 1951-2010年中国季平均降水高精度曲面建模分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(1): 49-58.
[12]	包黎莉, 秦承志, 朱阿兴, 呼雪梅. DEM误差对滑坡危险性评价模型的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(10): 1326-1333.
[13]	刘正佳, 于兴修, 王丝丝, 商贵铎. 薄盘光滑样条插值中三种协变量方法的降水量插值精度比较[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, (1): 56-62.
[14]	周婷婷, 陈文惠. 基于MODIS数据和气象观测数据的气温空间插值方法比较[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(9): 1143-1151.
[15]	曾红伟, 李丽娟, 张永萱, 柳玉梅. 大样本降水空间插值研究——以2009 年中国年降水为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(7): 811-818.