表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.04.013

地理科学进展 ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 114-122.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.04.013

表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展

程琴娟^1,2, 蔡强国^1,3, 李家永¹

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101|2．中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039|3．中国科学院陆地水循环与地表过程重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2005-04-01 修回日期:2005-05-01 出版日期:2005-07-25 发布日期:2005-07-25
作者简介:程琴娟（1981－）|女|硕博连读生|主要从事坡地侵蚀模拟等研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（40471084），中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所自然科学基金延伸支持领域前沿项目（CXIOG－A04－10），香港特区政府研究资助局支持项目（CUHK 4217/02H）。

Summarization on Study of Soil Surface Crust or Sealing and Its Effects on Erosion

CHENG Qinjuan^1,2, CAI Qiangguo^1,3, LI Jiayong¹

1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS., Beijing 100101|2． Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100039|
3. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS., Beijing 100101

Received:2005-04-01 Revised:2005-05-01 Online:2005-07-25 Published:2005-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

表土结皮是降雨后某些土壤表面普遍存在的现象，它是在降雨与土壤的相互作用下发育的；本文在综览大量文献的基础上，得出表土结皮研究还存在着很多有待深入的领域。一方面，由于影响降雨、土壤的因子复杂多变，因此表土结皮本身的形成过程很复杂，研究者的结论也有所不同。另一方面，表土结皮作为一种特殊的下垫面，影响坡面侵蚀的各子过程，但是影响机理还不清楚。表土结皮对坡面侵蚀过程的影响研究已经取得了一些定性方面的进展，但为了完善坡面侵蚀物理模型和达到准确的预报预测，定量研究还有待进一步深入和细化。

关键词: 溅蚀, 结皮, 径流, 抗蚀力, 入渗, 细沟侵蚀

Abstract:

Soil surface crust/sealing is developed by the interaction of rainfall and soil; and it is a common phenomenon of many soils in many arid semi-arid areas. On the basis of collecting materials and studying many papers, the authors not only focus on reviewing the study of mechanism, process, key factors such as soil characteristics, and rainfall characteristics of soil surface crust or sealing, but also pay attention to summarizing the impacts of soil surface crust or sealing on infiltration, soil erosion that includes splash erosion, anti-erosion capability and rill erosion, crop yield and so on. Then the authors conclude there are also many uncertainties about soil surface or sealing. On the one hand, rainfall and soil factors vary very much, so the developing process of soil surface crust/sealing is very complex, making the conclusions of researchers different from each other. On the other hand, soil surface crust/sealing is a special interface, so it affects the process of slope surface erosion. The qualitative analysis on the effects of surface crust/sealing has achieved some progress; however, in order to clarify the mechanism and perfect the model of slope surface erosion and precisely predict the erosion, it needs further quantitative analysis such as the impact of soil surface crust or sealing on splash-erosion rate, differentiation of impact of soil surface crust or sealing by different intensity, and interactive impact between soil surface crust or sealing and rill erosion.

Key words: anti-erosion capability, infiltration, rill erosion, splash erosion, surface crust/sealing

程琴娟,蔡强国, 李家永. 表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(4): 114-122.

CHENG Qinjuan, CAI Qiangguo, LI Jiayong. Summarization on Study of Soil Surface Crust or Sealing and Its Effects on Erosion[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(4): 114-122.

参考文献

[1] 蔡强国，陆兆熊．黄土发育表土结皮过程和微结构分析的试验研究．应用基础与工程科学学报，1996，4(4)：363~370．

[2] 景可，王万忠，郑粉莉编著. 中国土壤侵蚀与环境．北京：科学出版社，2005，130~138．

[3] Soil Quality Indicators：Soil Crusts．USDA Natural Conservation service，April 1996．

[4] Shibru Daba．Note on effects of soil surface crust on the grain yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in the Sahel．Field Crops Research，1999，61：193~199．

[5] L.D. Norton. Micromorphological study of surface seals developed under simulated rainfall. Geoderma, 1987, 40:127~140.

[6] D.S. McIntyre. Soil splash and the formation of surface crusts by raindrop impact. Soil Science, 1958, 85:261~266.

[7] J. L. Tackett, R.W. Pearson. Some characteristics of soil crusts formed by simulated rainfall. Soil Science, 1965, 99(6): 407~413.

[8] Dennis M. Fox, Yves Le Bissonnais, Philippe Quetin. The implication of spatial variability in surface seal hydraulic resistance for infiltration in a mound and depression microtopography. Catena, 1998, 32:101~114.

[9] University of Pretoria etd-Bobe, B W(2004).

[10] P. Farres. The role of time and aggregate size in the crusting process. Earth surface processes, 1978, 3:243~254.

[11] Y. chen, et al., Scanning electron microscope observations on soil crusts and their formation. Soil Science, 1980, 130(1):49~55.

[12] 熊顺贵．基础土壤学．北京：中国农业大学出版社，2001．

[13] I. Shainberg, G.J. Levy. Organic polymers and soil sealing in cultivated soils. Soil science, 1994, 158(4): 267~273.

[14] D.M. Freebairn, S.C. Gupta, W.J. Rawls. Influence of aggregate size and microrelief on development of surface soil crusts. Soil Sci. Am. J, 1991, 55:188~195.

[15] G.J. Levy, J. Levin, I. Shainberg. Seal formation and interrill soil erosion. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1994, 58:203~209.

[16] R. Stern, M. Ben-hur, I. Shainberg. Clay mineralogy effect on rain infiltration, seal formation and soil losses. Soil Science, 1991,152(6):455~462.

[17] D. M. Fox and Y. Le Bissonnais. Process-based analysis of aggregate stability effects on sealing, infiltration, and interrill erosion. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1998, 62:717~724.

[18] I.I.C. Wakindiki, M. Ben-Hur. Soil mineralogy and texture effects on crust micromorphology, infiltration, and erosion. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 2002, 66:897~905.

[19] Y. Le Bissonnais. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science, 1996, 47:425~437.

[20] 吴发启，范文波. 坡耕地黄墡土结皮的理化性质分析．水土保持通报， 2001，21(4)：22~24．

[21] H. J. C. Smith， G. J. Levy et al．，雨滴能量和土壤改良对渗透及侵蚀的影响．水土保持科技情报， 1994，2：37~41．（刘正杰译自“Soil Science Society of America Journal”1990年第4期）．

[22] 唐泽军，雷廷武，张晴雯，赵军．雨滴溅蚀和结皮效应对土壤侵蚀影响的试验研究．土壤学报，2004，41(4)：632~635．

[23] 赵晓光，吴发启．单雨滴击溅规律及其对溅蚀土粒地分选作用．水土保持学报， 2001， 15(1)：43~49．

[24] 张科利，细山田健三．坡面溅蚀发生过程及其与坡度关系的模拟研究．地理科学， 1998， 18(6)：561~566．

[25] 江忠善，刘志. 降雨因素和坡度对溅蚀影响的研究．水土保持学报，1989，3（2）：29~35．

[26] 黄锡荃．水文学．北京：高等教育出版社，1993，6．74~81．

[27] D.S. McIntyre. Permeability measurements of soil crusts formed by raindrop impact. Soil Science, 1958, 85:185~189.

[28] Daniel C. Moore, Michael J. Singer. Crust formation effects on soil erosion processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1990, 54:1117~1123.

[29] F. Graef, K. Stahr. Incidence of soil surface crust types in semi-arid Niger. Soil & Tillage Research, 2000, 55:213~218.

[30] Michael J. Singer, Yves Le Bissonnais. Importance of surface sealing in the erosion of some soils from a Mediterranean climate. Geomorphology, 1998, 24:79~85.

[31] 贾志军，王小平．黄土表面结皮对夏闲坡耕地土壤水分的影响研究．中国水土保持， 2002，9：18~19．

[32] 陈浩，蔡强国．坡度对坡面径流深、入渗量影响的试验研究．见：陈永宗，等．晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律实验研究文集．河南：水利电力出版社，1990．17~25．

[33] 赵晓光，石辉．水蚀作用下土壤抗蚀能力的表征．干旱区地理， 2003，26(1)：12~16．

[34] 陆兆熊，陈浩. 王贵平等．黄土抗剪力及可蚀性的时空变化规律．见：陈永宗，等．晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律实验研究文集．河南：水利电力出版社，1990．1~11．

[35] 蔡强国等．晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀管理与地理信息系统应用研究．北京：科学出版社，1992．45~53．

[36] 江忠善，刘志．降雨因素和坡度对溅蚀影响的研究．水土保持学报， 1989，3(2)：29~35．

[37] 吴普特，周佩华．地表坡度对雨滴溅蚀的影响．水土保持通报， 1991，11(3)：8~13．

[38] 陈一兵．测定溅蚀的方法研究．水土保持通报， 1994， 14(4)：34~38．

[39] 王协康，敖汝庄，喻国良，方铎．坡面雨滴溅蚀及其输沙能力的探讨．四川联合大学学报（工程科学版），1999，3(2)：7~12．

[40] Cruse R. M. and Larson W. E. Effect of soil shear strength on soil detachment due to raindrop impact. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1977, 41:777~781.

[41] Al-Durrach, M. M. and Bradford, J. M. New methods of studying soil detachment due to waterdrop impact. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1981, 45:949~953.

[42] Benjamin J.G. and Cruse R.M., Measurement of shear strength and bulk density of soil aggregates. 1985, 49: 1248~1251.

[43] 吴发启，范文波．土壤结皮与降雨溅蚀的关系研究．水土保持学报， 2001， 15(3)：1~3．

[44] 陆兆熊，蔡强国．黄土的表土结皮强度和溅蚀试验研究．见：陈永宗，等．晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律实验研究文集．河南：水利电力出版社，1990．58~67．

[45] 郑粉莉，唐克丽，周佩华．坡耕地细沟侵蚀影响因素的研究．土壤学报， 1989， 26(2)：109~116．

[46] 王贵平．细沟侵蚀研究综述．中国水土保持， 1998， 8：23~25．

表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展

Summarization on Study of Soil Surface Crust or Sealing and Its Effects on Erosion

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	胡庆芳, 曹士圯, 杨辉斌, 王银堂, 李伶杰, 王立辉. 汉江流域安康站日径流预测的LSTM模型初步研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 636-642.
[2]	李伶杰, 王银堂, 胡庆芳, 刘勇, 刘定忠, 崔婷婷. 基于时变权重组合与贝叶斯修正的中长期径流预报[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 643-650.
[3]	刘希林. 全球视野下崩岗侵蚀地貌及其研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(3): 342-351.
[4]	郭禹含, 王中根, 伍玉良. 多源再分析降水数据在拉萨河流域应用对比研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(8): 1033-1039.
[5]	徐苏, 张永勇, 窦明, 花瑞祥, 周宇建. 长江流域土地利用时空变化特征及其径流效应[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(4): 426-436.
[6]	李运刚, 何娇楠, 李雪. 基于SPEI和SDI指数的云南红河流域气象水文干旱演变分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(6): 758-767.
[7]	丁婧祎, 赵文武, 王军, 房学宁. 降水和植被变化对径流影响的尺度效应——以陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8): 1039-1051.
[8]	伊璇, 周丰, 王心宇, 杨永辉, 郭怀成. 基于SOM的流域分类和无资料区径流模拟[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1109-1116.
[9]	黄生志, 黄强, 王义民, 陈昱潼. 渭河径流年内分配变化特征及其影响因子贡献率分解[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1101-1108.
[10]	王龙生, 蔡强国, 蔡崇法, 孙莉英. 黄土坡面发育平稳的细沟流水动力学特性[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1117-1124.
[11]	王彦君, 王随继, 苏腾. 1955-2010年松花江流域不同区段径流量变化影响因素定量评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(1): 65-75.
[12]	奚秀梅, 刘海隆. 塔里木河干流径流量变化与太阳黑子活动的关系[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(6): 880-886.
[13]	孟德娟, 莫兴国. 气候变化对不同气候区流域年径流影响的识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(4): 587-594.
[14]	刘海猛, 石培基, 周俊菊, 刘海龙, 孙会慧. 石羊河中游径流损耗特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(1): 87-94.
[15]	张艳娇, 高小红, 李其江, 陈强, 杨军军. 气候变化情景下青海湟水流域径流变化的HIMS模拟分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(1): 59-67.