可达性研究的回顾与展望

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.03.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可达性是指利用一种特定的交通系统从某一给定区位到达活动地点的便利程度。可达性反映了区域与其他有关地区相接触进行社会经济和技术交流的机会与潜力。本文综合了可达性的主要定量评价方法,并对各种方法的优缺点进行了比较,总结了近期可达性评价方法的进展与动态。随后分别在区域和国家尺度与城市内部尺度上总结了可达性在区域经济发展研究、城市土地利用、社会服务设施提供、城市社会问题等各方面的应用。相对来讲,国内关于可达性的研究尚不丰富。最后,本文阐述了目前可达性研究中的问题,并对未来研究进行了展望。

关键词: 交通, 可达性, 空间结构, 评价方法

Abstract:

Accessibility denotes the ease with which activities may be reached from a given location using a particular transportation system. Accessibility reflects the opportunities and potentialities of a particular region to exchange with other regions. There is a number of accessibility measures, some accessibility indicators are generalized and compared in this paper: time of access to city centre, mean travel costs, opportunity accessibility, economic or population potential. Also, the progress of accessibility measures is reviewed. Accessibility indicators is applied both on regional and metropolitan dimension, such as the regional development, the impact of new infrastructure, the urban land use, the providing of social facilities, the urban social problems, and so on. Relative to the overseas there is rarely research on accessibility in our country. Therefore, some problems are put up in the end and accessibility research needs to be improved.

Key words: accessibility, accessibility measures, transportation

李平华, 陆玉麒. 可达性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(3): 69-78.

LI Pinghua, LU Yuqi. Review and Prospectation of Accessibility Research[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(3): 69-78.

参考文献

[1] Hansen W G. How accessibility shapes land-use . Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959, 25: 73~76.

[2] Morris J M, Dumble P L, Wigan M R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning . Transportation Research A, 1978, 13: 91~109.

[3] Linneker B, Spence N A. Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain . Environment and Planning A, 1992, 24: 1137~1154.

[4] Mackiewicz A, Ratajczak W. Towards a new definition of topological accessibility . Transportation Research B, 1996, 30 (1): 47~79.

[5] Kwan M P, Murray A T. Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications . Geographical Systems, 2003, 5: 129~138.

[6] Shen Q. Spatial technologies, accessibility, and the social construction of urban space . Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1998, 22 (5): 447~464.

[7] Gutierrez J, Gonzalez R, Gomez G. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns . Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4 (4):227~238.

[8] Gutierrez J. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid- Barcelona-French border . Journal of Transport Geography, 2001, 9: 229~242.

[9] Gutierrez J, Urbano P. Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the trans-European road network . Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4 (1):15~25.

[10] Vickerman R, Spiekerman K, Wegener M. Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe . Regional Studies, 1999, 33 (1): 1~15.

[11] Hagerstrand T. What about people in regional science ? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1970, 24: 7~21.

[12] Golob T F, McNally M G. A modal of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads . Transportation Research B, 1997, 31: 177~194.

[13] Odoki J B, Kerali H R, Santorini F. An integrated model for quantifying accessibility- benefits in developing countries . Transportation Research A, 2001, 35: 601~623.

[14] Recker W W, Chen C, McNally M G. Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains . Transportation Research A, 2001, 35: 339~369.

[15] Kwan M P. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework . Geographical Analysis, 1998, 30: 191~216.

[16] Kwan M P. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer, 1999, 51: 210~227.

[17] Black W R. Spatial interaction modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 1995, 3: 155~166.

[18] Congdon P. A Bayesian approach to prediction using the gravity model, with an application to patient flow modeling . Geographical Analysis, 2000, 32: 205~224.

[19] Berglund S, Karlstrom A. Identifying local spatial association in flow data . Journal of Geographical System, 1999, 1: 219~236.

[20] Lee K, Lee H. A new algorithm for graph-theoretic nodal accessibility measurement. Geographical Analysis, 1996, 30: 1~14.

[21] Kwan M P, Janelle D G, Goodchild M F. Accessibility in space and time: A theme in spatially integrated social science . Journal of Geographical Systems, 2003, 5: 1~3.

[22] O’Kelly M E, Horner M W. Aggregate accessibility to population at the county level: U.S. 1940~2000 . Journal of Geographical Systems, 2003, 5:5~23.

[23] Kim, H. M. & Kwan, M. P. Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2003, 5, 71~91.

[24] Vickerman R. Location, accessibility and regional development: the appraisal of trans- European networks . Transport Policy, 1996, 2, (4): 225~234.

[25] Bowen J. Airline hubs in Southeast Asia: national economic development and nodal accessibility . Journal of Transport Geography, 2000, 8: 25~41.

[26] Nutley S. Indicators of transport and accessibility problems in rural Australia . Journal of Transport Geography, 2003, 11: 55~71.

[27] Cross M, Nutley S. Insularity and accessibility: the small island communities of Western Ireland . Journal of Rural Studies, 1999, 15 (3): 317~330.

[28] Linneker B, Spence N. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway . Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4 (2): 77~92.

[29] Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A. High-speed rail transit impact on regional systems: does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion ? The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31: 77~98.

[30] Badoe D A, Miller E J. Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North American, and their implication for modeling . Transportation Research D, 2000, 5: 235~163.

[31] Fazal S. Land re-organisation in relation to roads in an Indian city . Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 191~199.

[32] van Eck J R., de Jong T. Accessibility analysis and spatial competition effects in the context of GIS-supported service location planning . Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1999, 23: 75~89.

[33] Talen E. The social equity of urban service distribution: An exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia . Urban Geography, 1997, 18 (6): 521~541.

[34] Gimpel J G, Schuknecht J E. Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box . Political Geography, 2003, 22 (5): 471~498.

[35] Wang F, Minor W W. Where the jobs are: Employment access and crime patterns in Cleveland . Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2002, 92 (3): 465~486.

[36] Lau J C Y, Chiu C C H. Accessibility of low-income workers in Hong Kong . Cities, 2003, 20 (3): 197~204.

[37] Alsnih R, Hensher D A. The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population. Transportation Research A, 2003, 37: 903~916.

[38] Church R, Marston J. Measuring accessibility for people with disability . Geographical Analysis, 2003, 35 (1): 83~96.

[39] Wirasinghe S C, Ghoneim N S. Spacing of bus-stops for many to many travel demand . Transportation Science, 1981, 15: 210~221.

[40] Murray AT, Davis R, Stimson R J, Ferreira L. Public transport access. Transportation Research D, 1998, 3:319~328.

[41] O’Sullivan D, Morrison A, Shearer J. Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach . International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000, 14 (1): 85~104.

[42] 陆大道. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995, 117~124.

[43] Loo B P Y. Development of a regional transport infrastructure: some lessons from the Zhujiang Delta, Guangdong, China . Journal of Transport Geography, 1999, 7: 43~63.

[44] 曹小曙, 阎小培. 经济发达地区交通网络演化对通达性空间格局的影响－以广东省东莞市为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(3): 305~312.

[45] Si-ming L, Yi-man S. Impact of the National Trunk Highway System on accessibility in China . Journal of Transport Geography, 2001, 9: 39~48.

[46] 金凤君, 王姣娥. 20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 293~302.