生计可持续性视角下精准扶贫的政策效应评估及其分异研究——以武陵山区石柱县为例
|
刘倩, 雷洋洋, 喻忠磊, 唐红林, 叶文丽, 杨新军
|
Policy effect and differentiation of targeted poverty alleviation from the perspective of livelihood sustainability:Taking Shizhu County, Wuling Mountains as an example
|
LIU Qian, LEI Yangyang, YU Zhonglei, TANG Honglin, YE Wenli, YANG Xinjun
|
|
表7 协变量倾向得分匹配质量检验
|
Tab.7 Covariate propensity score matching quality test
|
|
变量 | 核匹配 | | 最近邻匹配 | | 半径匹配(k=2) | | 局部线性回归匹配 | 标准化偏差/% | 匹配后差异检验P值 | 标准化偏差/% | 匹配后差异检验P值 | 标准化偏差/% | 匹配后差异检验P值 | 标准化偏差/% | 匹配后差异检验P值 | X1 | 0.3 | 0.968 | | | 1.6 | 0.823 | | | 1.6 | 0.823 | | | -1.6 | 0.815 | X2 | 2.0 | 0.768 | | | 1.9 | 0.791 | | | 1.9 | 0.791 | | | 0.0 | 1.000 | X3 | -6.8 | 0.380 | | | -4.9 | 0.499 | | | -4.9 | 0.499 | | | -2.5 | 0.742 | X4 | 2.8 | 0.700 | | | 1.5 | 0.834 | | | 1.5 | 0.834 | | | 6.0 | 0.410 | X5 | 2.8 | 0.700 | | | -11.9 | 0.108 | | | -4.6 | 0.537 | | | -10.0 | 0.172 | X6 | 0.3 | 0.970 | | | 0.4 | 0.954 | | | 0.4 | 0.954 | | | 8.7 | 0.220 | X7 | -6.5 | 0.349 | | | -14.3 | 0.043 | | | -3.0 | 0.682 | | | -4.4 | 0.546 | X8 | 1.5 | 0.824 | | | 3.7 | 0.593 | | | 3.7 | 0.593 | | | 3.0 | 0.660 | X9 | 2.8 | 0.692 | | | 6.1 | 0.401 | | | 6.1 | 0.401 | | | 9.3 | 0.195 |
|
|
|