DYRESM和新安江模型在洱海出入流重建中的应用对比
|
|
陈岚, 罗纯良, 李慧赟, 罗潋葱, 龚发露, 张如枫
|
Comparison of DYRESM and the Xin’anjiang Model in reconstructing inflows and outflows of Lake Erhai
|
|
CHEN Lan, LUO Chunliang, LI Huiyun, LUO Liancong, GONG Falu, ZHANG Rufeng
|
|
表5 新安江模型在不同地区参数对比
|
Tab.5 Optimized parameters of the Xin'anjiang Model applied to different areas of China
|
|
| 参数 | | 高原地区 | | 平原地区 | | 弥苴河流域 | 波罗江流域 | 洱海流域 | 王家坝流域[43] | 息县流域[44] | | UM/mm | | 74.48 | 71.16 | 5.00 | | 20.00 | 20.00 | | LM/mm | 111.75 | 228.35 | 50.00 | 90.00 | 60.00 | | DM/mm | 100.00 | 100.00 | 5.00 | 40.00 | — | | C | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.02 | 0.30 | 0.10 | | B | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | | Im/% | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.01 | | Sm/mm | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 5.63 | 53.60 | | Ex | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.50 | 1.20 | | Kg | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.65 | | Ki | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.05 | | Cg | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.99 | | Ci | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.70 | | Cs | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.40 | | L | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 5.00 | 1.00 |
|
|
|